In his dialogues holistic (2001). Ramon Gallegos Nava performs different interviews with several educators in the world, with the intention of rescuing them everything related to holistic education your vision-, there are interesting dialogues to my way of seeing things, such as the one done by dialogue between Ramon and Rogert Prentice: Ramon tells us that holistic education transcends the academic building. It also points out that the holistic education must be built through a spiritual field, integrating all the knowledge of mankind. It declares that there is a consensus of all because we think the same. There are some people who have a theoretical construction of holism and not acting as such, so you only see a facet of things.

Another type of people criticizes the holistic education for intellectual laziness and they are not prepared to submit themselves to the discipline that requires bringing together form the spirit. Coincides with Ramon in the sense of the danger of academizar the holistic education (speak of) (the holistic education but do not have a spiritual practice and are not interested in the community) also commented that the critical pedagogy is included within the holistic education, but clarifies that its use could be counterproductive in learners (be protesting, be criticizing, putting people in situations of great anguish, anger and resentment against the supposed enemies)in reality it is a pedagogy extremely violent and dangerous for children, tucking them bitterness and hatred in his spirit. So the road that follows the education. Holistic is one that is based on intelligence, universal love and dialogue. Dialogue and confrontation are at opposite ends and the route of the holistic education is the perennial philosophy that represents a safeguard. Because who act and has no consistency with what speaks, will be exposed. They commented that there are theories and conceptualizations about divine them, but most important is the direct and immediate experience of the spiritual.