The president of Fecode (Colombian Federation of Educators), Young Senn, assured that ” this proposal tries to unify the labor regimes that regulate the educational sector in Colombia, the one that applies for the tie professors to the teaching before the 2002 and another one for the teachers who were appointed after this fecha”. According to the union leader, the Decree 2277, that is to say, the labor norm that prevails to educational the old ones, must be put in discussion and coherence with the Constitution of 1991, because it was sent under the Political Letter of 1886 in 1979, in a constitutional and legal frame different from the present one. Boy added that the Decree 1278, that in the last governs for the tie teachers years, must be discussed because is a norm that desprofesionaliza the educational race and strikes the quality of the education ” when not demanding like requirement the pedagogical formation and saberes of those who is going to exert magisterio”. On the other hand, the Secretary General of the Educative Union Association of Medelln, Victor Higuita, it affirmed: ” Paradoxicalally, the proposal of the educational statute is very related to the governmental norms that at the moment are injuring teaching and create conditions to facilitate the privatization of the education, which would do necessary to reform the Constitution against the educative subject to avoid that becomes it one mercanca”. To this the position of doctor in multicultural education Red Raul is added, who indicated that ” some of the problems of the present system are related to the difficulty that exists to happen from a roster to another one, the interference that has the local authorities in the educative management to assign to positions public in the different regions and that this disposition is not fitted to the national reality and must be replanteada”. Higuita assured that ” the disposition on the ascent of the roster for the teachers cannot be submitted to a commission guarantees that it because the present conditions of work do not allow it, because the teachers cannot form academically and maintain his families to the same time. In order to obtain it, she must be the State the one that finances the formation of its educational ones, in agreement with the needs that pas” demands;. Finally, Higuita said that given the conditions of the nation it is been mistaken to countermand the decree 2277 and that the task is to rescue it and to reform it within the framework of a statute that guarantees and vindicates the educational work, to eliminate what is obsolete and to unify it with 1278 and 2277 to armor the public education..
Month: December 2016
Treatment
Why we say: I was treated () as an animal? One day of these I heard an expression, that has times did not hear, took which me to this reflection. Why the people say: – I was treated () as an animal! I was treated () as one () dog ()? Why the people associate the bad treatment to the treatment of an animal? Which the origin of the expression above? It will be that she is correct? Or better, who generated the act maltreats of it against the animal considered and it correct to the point to create the exclamaes acimas? I can seem suspicion when writing these brief lines, therefore I have three adorable dogs, mui loved and treated well. I give optimum of me they, beyond basic the inserted one in the laws and in common-sense, which is food, water, safe and comfortable environment, attention, cares veterinarians, among others. I give love, affection, treatment them as members of the family, therefore it is this that are. However, independent of my relation with my animals, I believe that the man must reflect in the alluded phrase, therefore we pass ahead what we hear, reproducing as if truth it was, without the least to question the origin, the meaning and what this matters for our lives. Why badly to be treated means to be treated as an animal? Why they deserve the maltratos? Who will be really irrational in this world where lives? Every day animal cruel they are assassinated, molested, commercialized and damaged. we what we make? They exist defending of the animals, however, they are very little front to the number of animals that they need aid. This reality alone will change if the mentality and the human behavior to move. I say, still, if somebody to say I treated that them as animal, with certainty this somebody was very well treated, therefore I respect the animals. It is the doubt pairando in air: Who is the irrationals, after all? The animals that suffer the maltratos caused for the human beings? Or the ones that if say human beings and cause pains and storms to the animals, are standed out, creatures of God. It does not remain me alternative not to be to request the God who has taken the animals stops next to Itself, while he has time, while the men they did not exterminaram them of the face of the Land.